Gods Intention

[RIJIMMY]

insane and unfortunately reinforces many of the stereotypes of repubs

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by RIJIMMY

insane and unfortunately reinforces many of the stereotypes of repubs

exactly

[detbuch]

[QUOTE=RIJIMMY;965425]insane

Really? What do you believe the intended biological consequence of rape is? It could be herpes. But that could also be a consequence of consentual sex. It could be pregnancy. But that could also be a consequence of consentsual sex. So what were God's, or nature's, or biology's intended consequences? It would seem that pregnancy, or venereal disease, or what ever biological "side" effects that might occur are the same for rape or consentual sex. So why is it insane to say, if you believe in God, that it was God's intention?

and unfortunately reinforces many of the stereotypes of repubs

How many stereotypes does it reinforce? Is it even a stereotype? Isn't the reinforcement an obvious concoction of those who wish to defeat repubs by making them all to be the same in every, including unpopular or presumably unacceptable ways? Is the best way to govern, doing so by dissembling, carefully creating public images that fit politically correct models. If we all must fit those models would such a society be worth living in? Would God, or the intelligent designer, or evolutionary nature even allow it?

[Jackbass]

Originally Posted by RIJIMMY

insane and unfortunately reinforces many of the stereotypes of repubs

You are correct these are the sound bytes the Maddows of the world live for
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Jackbass

You are correct these are the sound bytes the Maddows of the world live for
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yes, and it makes Romney and Ryan, according to your views unfit to serve in the office of President and Vice President.

[Jackbass]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Yes, and it makes Romney and Ryan, according to your views unfit to serve in the office of President and Vice President.

That is not correct Romney stated he felt abortion and reproductive rights are an issue for the states to decide not the federal government. I don't remember any where that Paul Ryan has stated he is 100% pro life or would look to change current precedent based on religious beliefs. How does that qualify as collusion of church and state?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Jackbass

That is not correct Romney stated he felt abortion and reproductive rights are an issue for the states to decide not the federal government. I don't remember any where that Paul Ryan has stated he is 100% pro life or would look to change current precedent based on religious beliefs. How does that qualify as collusion of church and state?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Then why are they endorsing Mourdock? Is it because they believe what he believes re God's intent? Or is it because they believe it is an issue for the states, and that Mourdock's beliefs are of no consequence to federal legislation? If the former, they are, by your view, not fit for office? If the latter, and you support Romney/Ryan, why do you care so much about Mourdock's view on God's will? And if it's a squishy attempt at political correctness so that both they and Mourdock can get elected, does your contempt for such dupicity hold second candle to getting your boys elected? And if that's so, then maybe you should hold your nose and let Mourdock get elected so your boys can get control of the Senate.

[FishermanTim]

Once again, was he stating that the rape was God's intent or was the fertization of an egg to create a zygote?

Two completely different issues that are complete opposites!

Let's clarify that first so that we will all know what he said and not what was "reported"!!!

[Sea Dangles]

There is no possible way to spin any result of a rape as Gods intention.

Unless Spince gets involved in the discussion.