Rittenhouse was legally in possession of that rifle

[Jim in CT]

ok, on many TV stations, and God knows how many blogs,, and even among a few of you here, I was told that Rittenhouse wasn’t legally allowed to be holding that rifle.

It’s all bullsh*t. Wisconsin law explicitly states that he was legally allowed to be in possession of that rifle, at that time, at that age. There was no crime.

No one bothered to read Wisconsin state law before they concluded he broke the law.

The left ( democrats and the media) need to somehow figure out that they are turning big numbers of people off, pushing them to the right.

Also, we found that Rittenhouses father lives in Kinosha. All this talk about how he had no reason to care about was happening there. No one knew that until the last couple of days. because it doesn’t fit The Narrative.

it’s so unbelievably dishonest and misleading.

Every single person in the media who said he committed a crime by possessing that rifle, was lying. Flat out lying. And America knows it. And we know why they did it.

Will any of them apologize for it?

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

ok, on many TV stations, and God knows how many blogs,, and even among a few of you here, I was told that Rittenhouse wasn’t legally allowed to be holding that rifle.

It’s all bullsh*t. Wisconsin law explicitly states that he was legally allowed to be in possession of that rifle, at that time, at that age. There was no crime.

No one bothered to read Wisconsin state law before they concluded he broke the law.

Mostly wrong.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

Mostly wrong.

with all that evidence, who can argue with you.

the judge knows less about Wisconsin law than you?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

with all that evidence, who can argue with you.

the judge knows less about Wisconsin law than you?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The judge said a poorly written law should favor the defense.

Jim, do you think a minor should be able to open carry a high velocity weapon in any state?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

The judge said a poorly written law should favor the defense.

Jim, do you think a minor should be able to open carry a high velocity weapon in any state?

the law says a 17 year old can have that rifle as long as it’s barrel was beyond a minimum length. his was.

no, for the 20th time i think what rittenhouse did was one of the dumber and more reckless things i’ve heard of. but it’s not against the law to be dumb and reckless.

he. didn’t. break. that. law.

i think it was dumb if him to be there with that rifle. dumb. but not illegal.

the way this was spun in the media, is unbelievable. now that the truth is seeing the light of the day, it’s one more thing to hold against the left.

are they trying to lose?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

the law says a 17 year old can have that rifle as long as it’s barrel was beyond a minimum length. his was.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Read the law, that’s not what it says. The judge is trying to get this kid off with nothing. I don’t think he should be in jail for life but he needs to own up to his incredibly reckless behavior.

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

the law says a 17 year old can have that rifle as long as it’s barrel was beyond a minimum length. his was.

no, for the 20th time i think what rittenhouse did was one of the dumber and more reckless things i’ve heard of. but it’s not against the law to be dumb and reckless.

he. didn’t. break. that. law.

i think it was dumb if him to be there with that rifle. dumb. but not illegal.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The judge didn’t find that the possession was legal. The defense found a contradictory statute buried in the books and successfully argued the charge should be dropped. The prosecution should have been prepared to appeal but they were not and the judge made the call literally minutes before closing arguments were set to begin. The law wasn’t clear and that usually favors the defense.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

should be able to open carry a high velocity weapon

good grief....

[Pete F.]

I might say, "Self defense is when they come to you, not when you come to them.", but perhaps that would be overly simplistic.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

I might say, "Self defense is when they come to you, not when you come to them.", but perhaps that would be overly simplistic.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

it would be overly stupid, if that’s what you meant.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

it would be overly stupid, if that’s what you meant.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Stupid, because as his lawyer said “Other people in this community have shot somebody seven times and it’s been found to be ok. My client did it four times…”
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Next they’ll be arguing against the prosecution of Franklin Sechriest, because you know how those people are
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

The judge removed the charge possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.

The charge is only a misdemeanor.. this doesn’t change the fact he shot 3 people 1 clearly unarmed who the kid of course claiming he said he was going to kill him , who can’t dispute it he’s dead ..

the other Armed man he shot who only exposed his weapon after The kid had already shot someone 4 times . Is conveniently denied his right to self defense ?

It’s just sad to see conservatives using this child as a proxy in their culture war

the ultimate, cheap, expendable, yet sophisticated human weapon.” They have no real sense of fear and, when indoctrinated

I watch a limited amount of the coverage the kid has no remorse beyond the 1st breakdown
But i did notice he would yawn without covering his mouth.. it showed to me how immature he is .

even the NY post covered it but gave no insight beyond that https://nypost.com/2021/11/02/kyle-r...omicide-trial/
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

I watch a limited amount of the coverage

But i did notice he would yawn without covering his mouth.. it showed to me how immature he is .



Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

brilliant.....

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

The judge removed the charge possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.

The charge is only a misdemeanor.. this doesn’t change the fact he shot 3 people 1 clearly unarmed who the kid of course claiming he said he was going to kill him , who can’t dispute it he’s dead ..

the other Armed man he shot who only exposed his weapon after The kid had already shot someone 4 times . Is conveniently denied his right to self defense ?

It’s just sad to see conservatives using this child as a proxy in their culture war

the ultimate, cheap, expendable, yet sophisticated human weapon.” They have no real sense of fear and, when indoctrinated

I watch a limited amount of the coverage the kid has no remorse beyond the 1st breakdown
But i did notice he would yawn without covering his mouth.. it showed to me how immature he is .

even the NY post covered it but gave no insight beyond that https://nypost.com/2021/11/02/kyle-r...omicide-trial/
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

who was clearly unarmed?

one had a gun.

one was trying to wrestle Rittenhouses gun away from him, after screaming that he was going to kill rittenhouse.

the other was hitting him in the head with a skateboard
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

the other Armed man he shot who only exposed his weapon after The kid had already shot someone 4 times . Is conveniently denied his right to self defense ?

https://nypost.com/2021/11/02/kyle-r...omicide-trial/
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Rittenhouse didn’t point his gun at that guy, until after that guy pointed his gun at rittenhouse. rittenhouse wasn’t threatening that guy when that guy pointed his gun at rittenhouse. video showed this, the guy admitted on the stand that rittenhouse didn’t point his gun at him, until after he pointed his gun at rittenhouse.

it’s a really bad idea to let riots go without putting them down, especially if governors ignore the riots because they don’t want to be seen as hostile to the BLM/Antifa cause. these things happen when violent riots are allowed to continue.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

the guy admitted on the stand that rittenhouse didn’t point his gun at him, until after he pointed his gun at rittenhouse.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

this does not matter to wayne...he has all of the "facts"

[Raider Ronnie]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Rittenhouse didn’t point his gun at that guy, until after that guy pointed his gun at rittenhouse. rittenhouse wasn’t threatening that guy when that guy pointed his gun at rittenhouse. video showed this, the guy admitted on the stand that rittenhouse didn’t point his gun at him, until after he pointed his gun at rittenhouse.

it’s a really bad idea to let riots go without putting them down, especially if governors ignore the riots because they don’t want to be seen as hostile to the BLM/Antifa cause. these things happen when violent riots are allowed to continue.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Prosecutor should be brought up on charges and loose his license to practice law !
Judge should have thrown out the whole case when the witness admitted under oath he pointed his gun 1st and the prosecutor tried to get him to change his prior statement.
There will be riots no doubt but there’s not much left to burn during the “peaceful protest”
The only way the jury convicts is if BLM did their job scaring the #^&#^&#^&#^& out of them with their threats to burn their homes and kill their kids !
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Don’t worry, Rittenhouse will be the keynote speaker at the next CPAC
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Don’t worry, Rittenhouse will be the keynote speaker at the next CPAC
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

if there’s value in putting a face on the issue of media dishonesty, who better?

it’s as if the left, the media, and big tech are all hypnotized by trump. even after what just happened in VA and what polling looks like, you can’t change course.

you’re all doing exactly what trump would want you to do. kudos.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Now that driving to another state to shoot people has basically been legalized I feel as though the opportunities are just endless.
Except you can’t drive to HI. 49 ain’t bad, thou.
Just gives everyone a whole new way to look at road hunting.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Now that driving to another state to shoot people has basically been legalized I feel as though the opportunities are just endless.
Except you can’t drive to HI. 49 ain’t bad, thou.
Just gives everyone a whole new way to look at road hunting.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

that’s right, einstein, he was just indiscriminately shooting at everyone he saw. especially the blacks.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

I'm thinking any woman seeking an abortion as she flees Texas is well-advised to grab a gun and let her reflexes rule. You know how easily a person of delicate sensibilities can feel threatened.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

I'm thinking any woman seeking an abortion as she flees Texas is well-advised to grab a gun and let her reflexes rule. You know how easily a person of delicate sensibilities can feel threatened.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i’m surprised anyone here has you un- blocked.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

According to the right - Ashli Babbitt should not have been killed as a rioter while breaking into the Speakers' Lobby at the Capitol

Yet, Kyle Rittenhouse is hailed as a hero for killing rioters

Question: If Rittenhouse were at the Capitol on 1/6, would he have shot Babbitt?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

According to the right - Ashli Babbitt should not have been killed as a rioter while breaking into the Speakers' Lobby at the Capitol

Yet, Kyle Rittenhouse is hailed as a hero for killing rioters

Question: If Rittenhouse were at the Capitol on 1/6, would he have shot Babbitt?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

If Babbitt chased you, and while you were down, she lifted a gun and pointed it at your head, would you shoot her?

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by detbuch

If Babbitt chased you, and while you were down, she lifted a gun and pointed it at your head, would you shoot her?

If I saw an active shooter who had killed two people and I was armed and he was in front of me I would have shot Kyle.
That guy who had the guns mistake was he failed to pull the trigger.
It would have been self defense, the kid had already killed two other people.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

If I saw an active shooter who had killed two people and I was armed and he was in front of me I would have shot Kyle.
That guy who had the guns mistake was he failed to pull the trigger.
It would have been self defense, the kid had already killed two other people.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I don’t think killing comes natural to most people. Had he shot Rittenhouse he would likely have been heralded as a hero for stopping suck a reckless teenager. So sad all around.

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by spence

I don’t think killing comes natural to most people. Had he shot Rittenhouse he would likely have been heralded as a hero for stopping suck a reckless teenager. So sad all around.

I don’t think it does either, but if you put yourself into a situation that is quite possibly violent and bring a weapon, it’s not because you’re there to give people first aid.
But he had Bandaids
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

I don’t think killing comes natural to most people. Had he shot Rittenhouse he would likely have been heralded as a hero for stopping suck a reckless teenager. So sad all around.

very sad all around. 100% correct.

and a textbook example of why it’s a horrible idea for local government ( and the feds) to allow these riots to continue until rioters run out of Molatov cocktails. When a governor decides that being seen as sympathetic to BLM is more important than keeping peace, he’s asking for this to happen.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device