Rittenhouse was legally in possession of that rifle

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

The judge said a poorly written law should favor the defense.

Jim, do you think a minor should be able to open carry a high velocity weapon in any state?

the law says a 17 year old can have that rifle as long as it’s barrel was beyond a minimum length. his was.

no, for the 20th time i think what rittenhouse did was one of the dumber and more reckless things i’ve heard of. but it’s not against the law to be dumb and reckless.

he. didn’t. break. that. law.

i think it was dumb if him to be there with that rifle. dumb. but not illegal.

the way this was spun in the media, is unbelievable. now that the truth is seeing the light of the day, it’s one more thing to hold against the left.

are they trying to lose?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device