Rittenhouse was legally in possession of that rifle

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

If I saw an active shooter who had killed two people and I was armed and he was in front of me I would have shot Kyle.
That guy who had the guns mistake was he failed to pull the trigger.
It would have been self defense, the kid had already killed two other people.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

sure you would Pete. sure you would.

what you described is retaliation, not self defense. not unless you had a reason to believe you were next.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

sure you would Pete. sure you would.

what you described is retaliation, not self defense. not unless you had a reason to believe you were next.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Just saving the next victim.
Kyle will likely try to kill again
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Just saving the next victim.
Kyle will likely try to kill again
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

no such thing as pre-emptive self defense. the threat to you
must be imminent.

sorry if that’s going too fast for you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

no such thing as pre-emptive self defense. the threat to you
must be imminent.

sorry if that’s going too fast for you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So you can only kill someone in self defense if you’re already dead?
Kyle didn’t even have someone in front of him with a gun.
Someone in front of you with a gun that’s already killed two people is an imminent threat.
Sorry if that’s going too fast for you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device