Rittenhouse was legally in possession of that rifle

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

This kid is Jim’s hero it’s amazing to watch

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

you obviously have not read anything Jim has written on the subject...that is what is amazing

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by scottw

you obviously have not read anything Jim has written on the subject...that is what is amazing

is really like to know, is he aware of what i said and he’s ignoring it to make it easier for him to respond? or has he actually never seen me say Rittenhouse was an idiot?

it’s an interesting question. Well never know the answer.

it is amazing.

still trying to comprehend the holiday inn express comment.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by scottw

you obviously have not read anything Jim has written on the subject...that is what is amazing

Oh I have.. and he has completely ignored all the evidence presented

According to Jim the kid is not responsible for his actions nothing he’s just a poor victim. And did nothing wrong..

Who should be seen as a law enforcement officer who has experience and trained in these situations

And was justified because he thought he was going to be killed or he thought they were going to take his gun and use it on Him .. Bla bla bla

Like I’ve said you start a fight and start losing . You cannot decide to suddenly claim self defense

The kid thought the Ar 15 gave him the power of intimidation. Why else would a 17 year we walking around solo in that environment

Being Immature didn’t help.

And I am not saying this kid went with a plan to shoot 3 people

but he went with the mindset he was willing to use his weapon and show those s people what’s what ..

It had nothing to do with with his desire to carry out some civic duty

As some have suggested
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Oh I have.. and he has completely ignored all the evidence presented

According to Jim the kid is not responsible for his actions nothing he’s just a poor victim. And did nothing wrong..

Who should be seen as a law enforcement officer who has experience and trained in these situations

And was justified because he thought he was going to be killed or he thought they were going to take his gun and use it on Him .. Bla bla bla

Like I’ve said you start a fight and start losing . You cannot decide to suddenly claim self defense

The kid thought the Ar 15 gave him the power of intimidation. Why else would a 17 year we walking around solo in that environment

Being Immature didn’t help.

And I am not saying this kid went with a plan to shoot 3 people

but he went with the mindset he was willing to use his weapon and show those s people what’s what ..

It had nothing to do with with his desire to carry out some civic duty

As some have suggested
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

again, you’re either very stupid or very much a liar.

he’s responsible for his actions. but he doesn’t get convicted, unless he broke the law. that’s how it works.

“nothing to do with his desire to carry out some civic duty.”

must be nice being a mind reader. we are all shocked that your wild speculation here, supports the liberal narrative.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

again.................

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

it's pretty remarkable...do you think he turns on the cold tap and yells that he's not getting any hot water?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by scottw

it's pretty remarkable...do you think he turns on the cold tap and yells that he's not getting any hot water?

no, that’s what happens at the Holiday Imm Express, so we are the ones who yell that.

if you EVER derive any clue what he was getting at there, let me know.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

no, that’s what happens at the Holiday Imm Express, so we are the ones who yell that.

if you EVER derive any clue what he was getting at there, let me know.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It's a reference to an old marketing campaign by Holiday Inn Express

"I didn't know you were a surgeon"
"I'm not, but I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night."

it was his attempt at Humor and Sarcasm but it fell flat because the delivery was terrible, he really should stick to his nonsensical ramblings and let the professionals handle the Sarcasm

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

It's a reference to an old marketing campaign by Holiday Inn Express

"I didn't know you were a surgeon"
"I'm not, but I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night."

it was his attempt at Humor and Sarcasm but it fell flat because the delivery was terrible, he really should stick to his nonsensical ramblings and let the professionals handle the Sarcasm

wow!!!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

It's a reference to an old marketing campaign by Holiday Inn Express

"I didn't know you were a surgeon"
"I'm not, but I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night."

it was his attempt at Humor and Sarcasm but it fell flat because the delivery was terrible, he really should stick to his nonsensical ramblings and let the professionals handle the Sarcasm

No it fell flat because those 2 are disconnected with anything current or mainstream … and the inability to do a 1second google search LOL
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Oh I have.. and he has completely ignored all the evidence presented

Jim has not ignored the evidence presented in the trial. Your opinions are not evidence.

According to Jim the kid is not responsible for his actions nothing he’s just a poor victim. And did nothing wrong..

Jim will probably correct your misrepresentation or lie or willful blindness or whatever it is, but, unless I'm as blind as you, I have not seen Jim say any of that.

Who should be seen as a law enforcement officer who has experience and trained in these situations

??

And was justified because he thought he was going to be killed or he thought they were going to take his gun and use it on Him .. Bla bla bla

The evidence presented in the trial backs up what he thought. Unlike your repeated bla bla bla opinionated comments.

Like I’ve said you start a fight and start losing . You cannot decide to suddenly claim self defense

What fight did he start? Is this more of your bla bla blaisms?

The kid thought the Ar 15 gave him the power of intimidation. Why else would a 17 year we walking around solo in that environment

Of course, there is no way, according to you, that he could have considered it was a means of protecting himself in a riotous situation. It could only mean, in your "why else" frame of opinionated bla blaismatic way of thinking that he wanted to walk around solo to intimidate.

Being Immature didn’t help.

True, but not a crime.

And I am not saying this kid went with a plan to shoot 3 people

That's a relief.

but he went with the mindset he was willing to use his weapon and show those s people what’s what ..

In the vast majority of times people carry a weapon they have a mindset of willingness to use it. That's what it's for.
Such a mindset is normal, not criminal.

It had nothing to do with with his desire to carry out some civic duty

As some have suggested
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Given you lack of credibility in your reliance on your opinion rather than on facts, evidence, and law, your conjecture/accusation on what his desire was carries no significant weight--that is, it is just more bla bla bla.