|
RI charters original argument was that if they could only keep 1 while neighboring states were allowed to keep 2, that would be unfair and cause people to book charters in other states.
Well, now the scenario has reversed itself...
We will now see how concerned RI is with "fairness", since if their original argument is valid, that means anglers from neighboring states will flock to RI to book charters for their 2 fish, thus making the unfair advantage (originally feared by RI) a reality for neighboring states.
Hmmmm.... one might almost think this ended up exactly as intended
Last edited by ivanputski; 03-05-2015 at 01:46 PM..
|
Threaded Mode