| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| StriperTalk! All things Striper |
 |
10-31-2019, 10:30 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Marshfield, MA
Posts: 1,751
|
Geez
When they finally pass some sort of conservation rule why can’t they make it simple and make it coastwise vice let each state make their own 18% reduction
Also I thought I read somewhere that mathematically a slot system didn’t work too well for a species since then that size will be targeted heavy. Could be wrong but thought it was proven that it didn’t work.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-31-2019, 10:31 AM
|
#2
|
|
All up in the Interweb!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the dog house.
Posts: 5,209
|
|
Co-Host of The Surfcast Podcast
"Out there in the surf is where it's at, that's where the line gets drawn in the sand between those who talk fishing and those who live it."
- a wise man. 
One good fish, a sharpie does not make...
Certified rock hopping billy goat.
|
|
|
|
|
10-31-2019, 11:03 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Warwick RI,02889
Posts: 11,794
|
My guess is in RI .no matter what they pass the RI charter boats will have a exception ><><
 |
ENJOY WHAT YOU HAVE !!!
MIKE
|
|
|
|
|
10-31-2019, 12:34 PM
|
#4
|
|
Oblivious // Grunt, Grunt Master
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: over the hill
Posts: 6,682
|
Keep in mind that neither the size limit nor the circle hook requirement apply to the commercial fishery.
As for the 18% commercial reduction, less than 70% of the MA quota was filled this year so an 18% reduction from the allowed quota would have had (and likely will have) no effect at all on the number of large fish killed by the commercial fishery in this state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-31-2019, 02:22 PM
|
#5
|
|
All up in the Interweb!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the dog house.
Posts: 5,209
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clammer
My guess is in RI .no matter what they pass the RI charter boats will have a exception ><><
|
The RIPCBA is working on getting a CE proposal together according to a post I read today on Facebook. They went on record as wanting status quo in the public comments, which I can understand the argument behind (not saying I agree or disagree with it personally) based on the difference in the inshore vs Block Island fishery. |
Co-Host of The Surfcast Podcast
"Out there in the surf is where it's at, that's where the line gets drawn in the sand between those who talk fishing and those who live it."
- a wise man.
One good fish, a sharpie does not make...
Certified rock hopping billy goat.
|
|
|
|
|
10-31-2019, 02:46 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by beamie
Geez
When they finally pass some sort of conservation rule why can’t they make it simple and make it coastwise vice let each state make their own 18% reduction
Also I thought I read somewhere that mathematically a slot system didn’t work too well for a species since then that size will be targeted heavy. Could be wrong but thought it was proven that it didn’t work.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
With CE available that basically what they did, albeit in a round about way. As long as a state's proposed rules reduce the catch by 18% they will be approved.
I agree, I think a slot is a poor choice. |
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28 AM.
|
| |
Hybrid Mode