Minneapolis teachers contract says white teachers get fired first

[Jim in CT]

This is explicitly in the contract. Let’s not fire the lousy teachers, let’s fire the honkeys.

Constitution, shmonstitution.

We are becoming too stupid to live.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...seniority.html

[Pete F.]

Poor victim

Tucker said you're going to be replaced, didn't he?

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

We are becoming too stupid to live.

Well, it was a good run

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Well, it was a good run

it was, it was a pretty good run. Time to give another species a shot.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Poor victim

Tucker said you're going to be replaced, didn't he?

how about telling us how it’s not a violation of the civil rights act, which is a federal law that explicitly prohibits employment discrimination based in race.

the victims are the kids, who get stuck with teachers whose qualification is skin color.

have you ever gotten one right?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Jim doesn’t understand the Teachers voted for the contract.. so there’s no discrimination it’s a condition of employment….

And of course Jim lies talking about people getting fired

White teachers would be laid off first

That’s not fired

And when’s the last time you heard of teachers getting laid off

Another spoon feed outrage from the far right echo chamber
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

how about telling us how it’s not a violation of the civil rights act, which is a federal law that explicitly prohibits employment discrimination based in race.

the victims are the kids, who get stuck with teachers whose qualification is skin color.

have you ever gotten one right?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You assume black teachers have no seniority and black teachers they will somehow take over theses schools

section states that if a nonwhite teacher is subject to excess, the district must instead excess a white teacher with the “next least” seniority

So basically if there are 150 white teachers And 4 black teachers and the need to lay 4 people off and 3 blacks have more seniority then the bottom 3 white and 1 black the black women keeps her job

Doesn’t sound that earth shattering

And please don’t make it sound as if you care about fairness all of a sudden

Ps search this story all the hits are right wing sites imagine that
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

the leftists are really in their glory when they can get on a good "you must be a racist" rant.....

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Ps search this story all the hits are right wing sites imagine that

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

and you subscribe to and monitor all of them no doubt...tell us what they are saying in the comments... OK?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

You assume black teachers have no seniority and black teachers they will somehow take over theses schools

section states that if a nonwhite teacher is subject to excess, the district must instead excess a white teacher with the “next least” seniority

So basically if there are 150 white teachers And 4 black teachers and the need to lay 4 people off and 3 blacks have more seniority then the bottom 3 white and 1 black the black women keeps her job

Doesn’t sound that earth shattering

And please don’t make it sound as if you care about fairness all of a sudden

Ps search this story all the hits are right wing sites imagine that
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

so instead of reading what i posted, you made stupid and wildly incorrect assumptions

The contract specifies that you group teachers by seniority, and fire the white ones first.

What if a white teacher happens to be the best teacher? Is that not possible?

anyway, you did what all of you do, you ignored what i said, and responded ( stupidly) to something i never came close to saying.

here’s a crazy idea…let’s judge people by what they do ( which we can all control) and leave color ( which we have no control over and therefore says absolutely nothing about us) out of it.

why not fire the tall teachers? or the blonde teachers?

do you ot see how stupid this is? just because it came from the left, you can’t criticize it. never.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by scottw

the leftists are really in their glory when they can get on a good "you must be a racist" rant.....

yup. it’s racist if i say skin color should not be considered.

it’s not racist to say that skin color is literally the only thing that matters.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Soon, you’ll be replaced

They’re coming for your boat too…..

It’s white, isn’t it?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

so instead of reading what i posted, you made stupid and wildly incorrect assumptions

The contract specifies that you group teachers by seniority, and fire the white ones first.

What if a white teacher happens to be the best teacher? Is that not possible?

anyway, you did what all of you do, you ignored what i said, and responded ( stupidly) to something i never came close to saying.

here’s a crazy idea…let’s judge people by what they do ( which we can all control) and leave color ( which we have no control over and therefore says absolutely nothing about us) out of it.

why not fire the tall teachers? or the blonde teachers?

do you ot see how stupid this is? just because it came from the left, you can’t criticize it. never.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You made stuff in your 1st sentence

This is explicitly in the contract. Let’s not fire the lousy teachers, let’s fire the honkeys.

Hence you have an integrity problem

2nd the contract was passed by the teachers themselves and

The policy doesn’t mention race, which better positions the district and union, experts say.

3rd it’s called a condition of employment

In my union we approved a contract that if you were seen smoking or using tobacco products you could be terminated

Of course those who got fired tried to say if violated their Rights.

The Courts said you willing negotiated that Right away for a raise

Same thing happened with detailed doctors notes people cried hippa

Courts sorry you negotiated that privacy away

This is no different just faux white outraged . Trying to claim it’s going to throw white better teachers out the door over black teachers who can’t possibly possess the same skills .. tell me I am wrong

Jim even under the old rules seniority would supersede the best teacher if they had no seniority

Didn’t see the Right complaining about that
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

You made stuff in your 1st sentence

This is explicitly in the contract. Let’s not fire the lousy teachers, let’s fire the honkeys.

Hence you have an integrity problem

2nd the contract was passed by the teachers themselves

3rd it’s called a condition of employment

In my union we approved a contract that if you were seen smoking or using tobacco products you could be terminated

Of course those who got fired tried to say if violated their Rights.

The Courts said you willing negotiated that Right away for a raise

Same thing happened with detailed doctors notes people cried hippa

Courts sorry you negotiated that privacy away

This is no different just faux white outraged . Trying to claim it’s going to throw white better teachers out the door over black teachers who can’t possibly possess the same skills .. tell me I am wrong

Jim even under the old rules seniority would supersede the best teacher if they had no seniority

Didn’t see the Right complaining about that
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

make it really really simple.

you have kids in a school. the school has to lay off a teacher. Would you rather (a) they fire the worst, laziest, least-skilled teacher, or (b) automatically fire the least senior white teacher, even if thatbhaooems to be a terrific teacher?

Have fun answering that.

everybody knows who the worst teachers are. How is it not best for the kids, to get rid of them first?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

I just got an expensive looking flyer from the NEARI telling it's members which democrats to vote for in upcoming elections

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by scottw

I just got an expensive looking flyer from the NEARI telling it's members which democrats to vote for in upcoming elections

and then once elected, hide democrats are beholden to those teachers and reward them with raises and benefits which dwarf what’s available to those who work in the private sector. That’s not corrupt.

here i’m CT, for ten years, the speaker of the state house of representatives was a liberal
democrat. Legislature is a part time job in CT, they all have full
time jobs. His full time job? He was a rep for the largest state employee union! He worked for the state employee union. So as a state rep, it was his job to vote on the size of his paycheck at his full
time job. No conflict of interest there!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

make it really really simple.

you have kids in a school. the school has to lay off a teacher. Would you rather (a) they fire the worst, laziest, least-skilled teacher, or (b) automatically fire the least senior white teacher, even if thatbhaooems to be a terrific teacher?

Have fun answering that.

everybody knows who the worst teachers are. How is it not best for the kids, to get rid of them first?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

to funny your article has nothing to do with (a) they fire the worst, laziest, or keeping least-skilled teacher it's still all about seniority until it gets to the bottom of the list

but keep injecting something that doesn't apply

the way its written A white teacher would have the same protections if the majority of teachers we Black .. but again if the contract stated Race which it does not

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by scottw

I just got an expensive looking flyer from the NEARI telling it's members which democrats to vote for in upcoming elections

what you don't know how a political action committee works ?



In the United States, a political action committee (PAC) is a 527 organization, that pools campaign contributions from members and donates those funds to campaigns for or against candidates, ballot initiatives, or legislation.

they cant and dont use union funds to promote campaigns for or against candidates, ballot initiatives, or legislation.

But again Scott don't let the facts get in your way

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

to funny your article has nothing to do with (a) they fire the worst, laziest, or keeping least-skilled teacher it's still all about seniority until it gets to the bottom of the list

but keep injecting something that doesn't apply

the way its written A white teacher would have the same protections if the majority of teachers we Black .. but again if the contract stated Race which it does not

right. the article
doesn’t mention firing the worst teacher, because per the contract, they must fore the white teacher.

I don’t think you understand what’s happening. i’ll
see if i can put it into a pop-up book for you.

it’s not all about seniority. it’s about seniority and race
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

what you don't know how a political action committee works ?



In the United States, a political action committee (PAC) is a 527 organization, that pools campaign contributions from members and donates those funds to campaigns for or against candidates, ballot initiatives, or legislation.

they cant and dont use union funds to promote campaigns for or against candidates, ballot initiatives, or legislation.

But again Scott don't let the facts get in your way

Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw View Post
I just got an expensive looking flyer from the NEARI telling it's members which democrats to vote for in upcoming elections

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

I don’t think you understand what’s happening. i’ll
see if i can put it into a pop-up book for you.

i
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

he's wound pretty tight.....

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

what you don't know how a political action committee works ?



In the United States, a political action committee (PAC) is a 527 organization, that pools campaign contributions from members and donates those funds to campaigns for or against candidates, ballot initiatives, or legislation.

they cant and dont use union funds to promote campaigns for or against candidates, ballot initiatives, or legislation.

But again Scott don't let the facts get in your way

so you’re saying that public teachers unions are political action committees? i agree. i was in one.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

so you’re saying that public teachers unions are political action committees? i agree. i was in one.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

he's just yelling about something that was never said again....

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by scottw

Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw View Post
I just got an expensive looking flyer from the NEARI telling it's members which democrats to vote for in upcoming elections

Here are endorsements pay a pac


Yet In You mind their telling their members who to vote for …

More fantasy’s
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by scottw

he's just yelling about something that was never said again....

Like usual you said nothing but implied much . Then you deny you meant anything what a surprise
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

so you’re saying that public teachers unions are political action committees? i agree. i was in one.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yes Jim you were in a union . Not sure why? Your an anti unionist


And if you wanted you donated to your unions PAC or not

it’s was never required was it.

But it’s funny conservatives like yourself have no issues with dark money and corporate lobbyists

But a teacher union you see as a threat and their political sway is somehow unfair LOL
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Yes Jim you were in a union . Not sure why? Your an anti unionist


And if you wanted you donated to your unions PAC or not

it’s was never required was it.

But it’s funny conservatives like yourself have no issues with dark money and corporate lobbyists

But a teacher union you see as a threat and their political sway is somehow unfair LOL
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i asked if you consider teachers unions to be PACs. you afraid to
answer?

teachers unions hurt kids and communities. they enrich teachers and democrats.

when i taught, i offered to be the teacher moderator for the ping ping club. there was no money in it, the school was broke. i was happy to do it for free. I get a letter from the union ordering me not to do it unless they paid me.

All for the kids.

They ( the union) are the most soulless whores you could ever meet.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i asked if you consider teachers unions to be PACs. you afraid to
answer?

teachers unions hurt kids and communities. they enrich teachers and democrats.

when i taught, i offered to be the teacher moderator for the ping ping club. there was no money in it, the school was broke. i was happy to do it for free. I get a letter from the union ordering me not to do it unless they paid me.

All for the kids.

They ( the union) are the most soulless whores you could ever meet.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Once again Jim you are trying to say unions and pac committees are the same thing shocking

Do you ever get tired of pounding a square pegs into a round holes





teachers unions hurt kids and communities. they enrich teachers and democrats.

Yep teachers are so rich and they enrich Democratic’s

They ( the union) are the most soulless whores you could ever meet.


please spare me your conspiracy’s your just another victim blaming others because you don’t have their pay or their benefits or the guts to do the job … you re pettiness is pathetic for a grown man

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Like usual you said nothing but implied much . Then you deny you meant anything what a surprise

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

no, you just reacted reflexively and started spouting before thinking...

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by scottw

no, you just reacted reflexively and started spouting before thinking...

Shocking
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device