Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Striper Chat - Discuss stuff other than fishing ~ The Scuppers and Political talk » The Scuppers

The Scuppers This is a new forum for the not necessarily fishing related topics...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-22-2025, 06:34 AM   #1
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,463
Ahhhhhhh, a little political thread is refreshing. I do wish Jim were around so we could bring up his old posts about conservatives never, ever, ever rioting.

Can we at least agree the blanket pardoning/commutation of violent criminals who beat up police is patently reprehensible? For the sake of argument I’m even willing to set aside why they were there (Trump) why they were rioting (also Trump) and why many people falsely believe they were given unfair sentences (also, also Trump.)

Never seen anything like this in my lifetime.
spence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2025, 07:08 AM   #2
Rmarsh
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
Ahhhhhhh, a little political thread is refreshing. I do wish Jim were around so we could bring up his old posts about conservatives never, ever, ever rioting.

Can we at least agree the blanket pardoning/commutation of violent criminals who beat up police is patently reprehensible? For the sake of argument I’m even willing to set aside why they were there (Trump) why they were rioting (also Trump) and why many people falsely believe they were given unfair sentences (also, also Trump.)

Never seen anything like this in my lifetime.

What are your excuses for Biden pardoning Leonard Peltier. A cold blooded murderer who shot and killed two FBI agents at close range? I dont really expect an intelligent answer.....but give it a shot....ill listen. Let me guess though. "He didnt get a fair trial"
Rmarsh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2025, 11:49 AM   #3
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rmarsh View Post
What are your excuses for Biden pardoning Leonard Peltier. A cold blooded murderer who shot and killed two FBI agents at close range? I dont really expect an intelligent answer.....but give it a shot....ill listen. Let me guess though. "He didnt get a fair trial"
Budda whadda shouldda didda, I thought we were talking about Trump

Whatever, seems like the Native American community (full disclosure, I am a card carrying Cherokee) in general has long fought for clemency on the grounds evidence was falsified in an environment of rampant judicial abuse towards indigenous people’s struggle for self determination. As Dr Oakley noted, President Biden didn’t give him a full pardon, but did recognize those fighting against injustice by letting him live what little is left of his life at home.

To be honest, serving five decades for a contested double murder charge when you don’t pose any further threat seems like Justice served. I do think the primary reason Wray strongly opposed his change in status is because to this day he maintains he did not kill the agents who died.

But that happened in the early 1970s, Trump’s blanket pardoning of hundreds of convicted violent criminals was just in the past few years and is, wait, was ongoing in our system.

People on the Right are so quick to jump on the smallest comment by a leftie they argue incites aggression towards police, I guess now if it’s in the name of MAGA, well, must be open season on first responders.
spence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2025, 12:10 PM   #4
Rmarsh
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
Budda whadda shouldda didda, I thought we were talking about Trump

Whatever, seems like the Native American community (full disclosure, I am a card carrying Cherokee) in general has long fought for clemency on the grounds evidence was falsified in an environment of rampant judicial abuse towards indigenous people’s struggle for self determination. As Dr Oakley noted, President Biden didn’t give him a full pardon, but did recognize those fighting against injustice by letting him live what little is left of his life at home.

To be honest, serving five decades for a contested double murder charge when you don’t pose any further threat seems like Justice served. I do think the primary reason Wray strongly opposed his change in status is because to this day he maintains he did not kill the agents who died.

But that happened in the early 1970s, Trump’s blanket pardoning of hundreds of convicted violent criminals was just in the past few years and is, wait, was ongoing in our system.

People on the Right are so quick to jump on the smallest comment by a leftie they argue incites aggression towards police, I guess now if it’s in the name of MAGA, well, must be open season on first responders.
I always enjoy your eloquent responses. But in short you are defending a douple cop murderer. For reasons youve explained so well. Murder is sometimes. Forgiveness is virtuous.

Last edited by Rmarsh; 01-22-2025 at 12:17 PM..
Rmarsh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2025, 12:16 PM   #5
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rmarsh View Post
I always enjoy your eloquent responses. But in short you are defending a douple cop murderer. For reasons youve explained so well.
No, I’m saying I don’t find the modification to his sentence to be out of bounds considering all the relevant context. In the eyes of the law he’s still guilty of a double murder and many have done less time for the same crime.

You’re comparing apples and oranges really.
spence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2025, 12:40 PM   #6
Rmarsh
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
No, I’m saying I don’t find the modification to his sentence to be out of bounds considering all the relevant context. In the eyes of the law he’s still guilty of a double murder and many have done less time for the same crime.

You’re comparing apples and oranges really.
Yes its comparing a muderer whose cause you sympathize with a murderer you dont care about....or the dead victims families children innocent.⁸ok lunch time over for me
Rmarsh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2025, 03:25 PM   #7
Pete F.
Canceled
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
Budda whadda shouldda didda, I thought we were talking about Trump

Whatever, seems like the Native American community (full disclosure, I am a card carrying Cherokee) in general has long fought for clemency on the grounds evidence was falsified in an environment of rampant judicial abuse towards indigenous people’s struggle for self determination. As Dr Oakley noted, President Biden didn’t give him a full pardon, but did recognize those fighting against injustice by letting him live what little is left of his life at home.

To be honest, serving five decades for a contested double murder charge when you don’t pose any further threat seems like Justice served. I do think the primary reason Wray strongly opposed his change in status is because to this day he maintains he did not kill the agents who died.

But that happened in the early 1970s, Trump’s blanket pardoning of hundreds of convicted violent criminals was just in the past few years and is, wait, was ongoing in our system.

People on the Right are so quick to jump on the smallest comment by a leftie they argue incites aggression towards police, I guess now if it’s in the name of MAGA, well, must be open season on first responders.
Not sure that according to his birthright executive order you are still a citizen

“The Trump administration then goes on to argue that the 14th Amendment’s language — the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” — is best understood “to exclude the same individuals who were excluded by the Act —i.e., those who are ‘subject to any foreign power’ and ‘Indians not taxed.’”

The Justice Department attorneys return to the topic of whether or not Native Americans should be entitled to birthright citizenship later in their arguments, citing a Supreme Court case, Elk v. Wilkins, in which the court decided that “because members of Indian tribes owe ‘immediate allegiance’ to their tribes, they are not ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and are not constitutionally entitled to Citizenship.”
“The United States’ connection with the children of illegal aliens and temporary visitors is weaker than its connection with members of Indian tribes. If the latter link is insufficient for birthright citizenship, the former certainly is,” the Trump administration argued.

The argument marks a sharp departure from the government’s opinion, which has held that Native Americans who are citizens of their respective tribes are also citizens of the United States.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!

Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?

Lets Go Darwin
Pete F. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2025, 04:00 PM   #8
Rmarsh
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F. View Post
Not sure that according to his birthright executive order you are still a citizen

“The Trump administration then goes on to argue that the 14th Amendment’s language — the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” — is best understood “to exclude the same individuals who were excluded by the Act —i.e., those who are ‘subject to any foreign power’ and ‘Indians not taxed.’”

The Justice Department attorneys return to the topic of whether or not Native Americans should be entitled to birthright citizenship later in their arguments, citing a Supreme Court case, Elk v. Wilkins, in which the court decided that “because members of Indian tribes owe ‘immediate allegiance’ to their tribes, they are not ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and are not constitutionally entitled to Citizenship.”
“The United States’ connection with the children of illegal aliens and temporary visitors is weaker than its connection with members of Indian tribes. If the latter link is insufficient for birthright citizenship, the former certainly is,” the Trump administration argued.

The argument marks a sharp departure from the government’s opinion, which has held that Native Americans who are citizens of their respective tribes are also citizens of the United States.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Thats nice
Pete tell us why you thought indictmemts against Trump would stop American voters from electing him for a second term. Or dont
Rmarsh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2025, 04:24 PM   #9
Pete F.
Canceled
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rmarsh View Post
Thats nice
Pete tell us why you thought indictmemts against Trump would stop American voters from electing him for a second term. Or dont
I think McConnell missed the opportunity to get FFOTUS out of the political arena.
Inciting an insurrection is a valid cause for impeachment isn’t it?

Since he failed to do that an aggressive prosecutor would have pushed the first case into court and not let FFOTUS delay proceedings till his Court (his words) gave him the power of a king.

Instead we have FFOTUS pardoning criminals convicted for assaulting law officers and calling them hostages, drug dealers and cops who killed citizens.
Tell me how Trumplicans are the Anti crime party.
It’s obvious that FFOTUS has caused you to lose touch with reality.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!

Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?

Lets Go Darwin
Pete F. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2025, 04:54 PM   #10
Rmarsh
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F. View Post
I think McConnell missed the opportunity to get FFOTUS out of the political arena.
Inciting an insurrection is a valid cause for impeachment isn’t it?

Since he failed to do that an aggressive prosecutor would have pushed the first case into court and not let FFOTUS delay proceedings till his Court (his words) gave him the power of a king.

Instead we have FFOTUS pardoning criminals convicted for assaulting law officers and calling them hostages, drug dealers and cops who killed citizens.
Tell me how Trumplicans are the Anti crime party.
It’s obvious that FFOTUS has caused you to lose touch with reality.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
.....Americans in large numbers made sure he was reelected.....you know the people at Trump rallys he compared to garbage...people like me you know....married 48 years....worked everyday for 52 years.....raised two full grow sons who love and respect me never had any problems with them...none....a guy who grew up dirt poor but managed the american dream by grit deternation and balls to make it.....we dont deserve to be called garbage and nazis. Thank you
By the way....i lead crews with guys who are not white and not natural born citizens.....i treat them with respect and they love me and love working under me.
Rmarsh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2025, 05:56 PM   #11
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F. View Post
Tell me how Trumplicans are the Anti crime party.
It’s a lot worse than that. Republicans have used the police as a cudgel against liberals for decades. Even the slightest criticism of police led to accusations of anti police bias, inciting violence against cops etc…and a lot of it was effective.

With one swipe of a fat black marker Trump just threw all of that away because he was in a rush, too arrogant and too lazy to process individual cases contradicting most of his party including his VP and Speaker in the process.

Perhaps the single dumbest political thing ever and it will likely be his undoing. Wait until these people start getting picked up for crimes, oops, they already are.
spence is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com