|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
StriperTalk! All things Striper |
 |
07-04-2008, 09:20 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Easton, MA
Posts: 5,737
|
Very nice fish! From the profile, I would have guessed an honest 40. Your post goes to show that without weighing their fish, a lot of guys are proably a bit off when claiming they take 30 and 40# fish.
|
|
|
|
07-05-2008, 04:05 AM
|
#2
|
Respect your elvers
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: franklin ma
Posts: 3,368
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishbones
Very nice fish! From the profile, I would have guessed an honest 40. Your post goes to show that without weighing their fish, a lot of guys are proably a bit off when claiming they take 30 and 40# fish.
|
I couldn't agree with you more.
Nice one Paul, I would have guessed in the 40's.
|
It's not the bait
At the end of your line
It's the fishing hole
Where all the fish is blind
|
|
|
07-05-2008, 08:37 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: RI
Posts: 429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back Beach
I couldn't agree with you more.
Nice one Paul, I would have guessed in the 40's.
|
Same here Paul - I was thinking low 40's. And I was pegging you at about 185... 
|
|
|
|
07-05-2008, 02:10 PM
|
#4
|
Steve "Van Staal"
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cranston
Posts: 544
|
Low 40s? I would have guessed 29 to 32 pounds. how many really big fish have any of you acually seen? there is a huge difference between a 40lb bass and a 31lb bass. But congrats, nice fish but not close to a 40 !
|
|
|
|
07-05-2008, 02:22 PM
|
#5
|
Finally
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 7,181
|
yup, nice 1
Last edited by fishaholic18; 07-05-2008 at 02:29 PM..
|
F-18®
It IsWhat It Is
¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º >¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((( º>
|
|
|
07-05-2008, 02:30 PM
|
#6
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Middleboro MA
Posts: 17,125
|
Well dave, not everyone is an expert who has caught and seen many large bass, and only a few were even aware of the size of Piemma. If it had been Flaptail holding that fish , and the angle was better with the fish displayed to show the girth, I would have gotten it within a pound or 2 I bet. But you got to see it in 3 dimensions, HUGE difference there seeing it in person. Hard to tell how long the fish is from that shot. A picture on the computer is completely different than in person and I think you know that. Maybe that was Paul's point of the thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishaholic18
Yup, I saw the fish in person and guessed 30-32 before it was even weighed..WTF are you guys thinking??? 48??? Are u kidding me??? 
|
it is a nice fish 
Last edited by Slipknot; 07-05-2008 at 02:33 PM..
Reason: should I edit my quote since you edited your reply?
|
|
|
|
07-06-2008, 01:30 PM
|
#7
|
President - S-B Chapter - Kelly Clarkson Fan Club
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Rowley
Posts: 3,781
|
either way that is a nice fish!! congrats man!
yeah, it's hard to tell from pictures, although I seem to be decent at eyballing fish caught on TV! 
|
|
|
|
07-06-2008, 09:33 PM
|
#8
|
Finally
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 7,181
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slipknot
Well dave, not everyone is an expert who has caught and seen many large bass, and only a few were even aware of the size of Piemma. If it had been Flaptail holding that fish , and the angle was better with the fish displayed to show the girth, I would have gotten it within a pound or 2 I bet. But you got to see it in 3 dimensions, HUGE difference there seeing it in person. Hard to tell how long the fish is from that shot. A picture on the computer is completely different than in person and I think you know that. Maybe that was Paul's point of the thread.
it is a nice fish 
|
I guess. 
|
F-18®
It IsWhat It Is
¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º >¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((( º>
|
|
|
07-07-2008, 12:36 PM
|
#9
|
Cape Crusader
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Ashland, MA
Posts: 323
|
Not only are they "offf, but they're convinced they're not off."
"Look at the belly on that fish....has to be at least 40!"
It takes catching quite a few fish to be able to get reasonably accurate, and even then knowlegable folks can be off by 15% very frequently.
I had it at 37 pounds before I saw the answer.
Last edited by Blitzseeker; 07-07-2008 at 04:35 PM..
|
|
|
|
07-07-2008, 03:58 PM
|
#10
|
Steve "Van Staal"
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cranston
Posts: 544
|
Nice fish Paul! Photos can be deceiving!
|
|
|
|
07-07-2008, 04:03 PM
|
#11
|
Very Grumpy bay man
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 10,824
|
Indeed. This fish amazed me. i really thought, at first, it was high 30s. When I got it in the boat I knew it wasn't but it just looked BIG. I think the real difference was that it had a smallish head, big belly but no shoulders.
|
No boat, back in the suds. 
|
|
|
07-07-2008, 04:44 PM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,883
|
I thought it looked like a forty but had the head of a twenty. I didn't know if it was gonna be high or low, but figured it was deceiving.
|
No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 AM.
|
| |