Rittenhouse was legally in possession of that rifle

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Oh I have.. and he has completely ignored all the evidence presented

According to Jim the kid is not responsible for his actions nothing he’s just a poor victim. And did nothing wrong..

Who should be seen as a law enforcement officer who has experience and trained in these situations

And was justified because he thought he was going to be killed or he thought they were going to take his gun and use it on Him .. Bla bla bla

Like I’ve said you start a fight and start losing . You cannot decide to suddenly claim self defense

The kid thought the Ar 15 gave him the power of intimidation. Why else would a 17 year we walking around solo in that environment

Being Immature didn’t help.

And I am not saying this kid went with a plan to shoot 3 people

but he went with the mindset he was willing to use his weapon and show those s people what’s what ..

It had nothing to do with with his desire to carry out some civic duty

As some have suggested
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

again, you’re either very stupid or very much a liar.

he’s responsible for his actions. but he doesn’t get convicted, unless he broke the law. that’s how it works.

“nothing to do with his desire to carry out some civic duty.”

must be nice being a mind reader. we are all shocked that your wild speculation here, supports the liberal narrative.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device